The Digital Edge (When Gamers Have the Upper Hand)

However, without even knowing anything else about the game, it is easy to calculate the return, assuming Optimal Strategy, and a jackpot of $0.00. This is how you will determine how much you are expected to lose, every hand, assuming you do not hit the jackpot and otherwise run at expectation.

The first page of the initial site mentioned showcases the break-even point at $1,230 with a probability of 1 in 40,391 for winning the Jackpot. This effectively serves as a Roulette with a Royal Progressive jackpot that begins with a base amount of 1200 coins, or 240 coins for each coin wagered. The Wnternetradiomercedes.com Keno could effortlessly calculate this, but I’ll also demonstrate a method applicable to any game.

So, knowing that $1,230 is the break-even value leading to a 100% return, we multiply this cash value by the corresponding probability:

Money$uit 31

In terms of cash input, this result indicates a contribution of 3.045232848 cents per hand at the break-even point. By dividing this by the wagered amount:

English

We observe that 2.436186278% of this outcome is derived from this result at the break-even level, suggesting an anticipated return of:

Chinese (Simplified)

Assuming all hands are played efficiently under normal circumstances, there exists a 97.563813722% RTP when the result does not occur.

Chinese (Traditional)

Log In

This aligns with the 3.045232847 cents per hand, which signifies the contribution of the Progressive at the break-even value.

The most impressive aspect of this straightforward calculation is that you can perform it for any of these games. Let’s examine a non-video poker game for another instance:

As I write this, I'm reviewing Sign Up , yet another Playtech offering, which has a break-even figure of $26,968 and a probability of 1 in 23,885 for winning, based on a $5 bet.

The anticipated payout at break-even would be:

Home

With a betting amount set at five dollars, dividing the outcome contribution by the bet size reveals that:

›

22.581536529% of the overall value, at break-even, is generated from this outcome. Thus, with Optimal Strategy and assuming all other factors align:

Online Gambling

The RTP would stand at 77.418463471%, implying a player's expected loss of:

›

Let’s hypothesize for a moment that both the MegaJacks and this game were set at their break-even amounts but both based on a $5 wager: Even with its extended hit cycle, Genie’s Hi-Lo would necessitate a considerably larger bankroll to effectively pursue a win compared to the MegaJacks game, largely due to the much greater drop between hits.

If both games were to follow the same cycle pattern before yielding a result, and all else remained constant, then:

Last updated: Nov 21, 2024

You would find yourself down $4,919.99999773 (rounding to $4920) prior to the outcome occurring, at which point, you would have recouped your investment. The break-even value from a $1.25 wager is $1,230, and multiplying this by four (as $1.25 represents one-quarter of $5) results in $4920.

Conversely, the cycle for Genie’s Hi-Lo comprises 23,885 plays, during which you could lose:

On this page

$26,968, which coincidentally represents the break-even amount for this jackpot.

Despite the MegaJacks featuring a lower likelihood of hitting, the drop is 5.4822118 times less severe than that of Genie’s Hi-Lo, simply due to the high payout contribution of Genie’s Hi-Lo to achieve that 100% return.

The main takeaway from all this is that, if you're on the lookout for online games with a favorable RTP, it's crucial to ensure that you have the funds necessary to create a significant opportunity to leverage your advantage. This necessitates not only an understanding of the chance of winning but also a grasp of the potential loss that might occur in between.

On this page Introduction