Golf scene analysis in Goldfinger
Aside from Casino Royale, which I plan to review last, we’ve discussed every casino scene in official James Bond films produced by Eon Productions in previous newsletters. This week, we're focusing on the golf scene from Goldfinger , which presented some significant betting. You can find the scene on YouTube . I will refer to this clip in this article.
The scene kicks off with Bond and Goldfinger facing off at the golf course where they decide to play for a shilling per hole. To put it in perspective, a shilling is to a pound what a nickel is to a dollar. Given the context of inflation, I believe this is quite a minimal wager for both of them, particularly for Goldfinger, who owns the golf course. On the other hand, I wouldn't risk much against a golfer whose abilities I wasn't familiar with.
At the 0:54 mark, Bond executes an impressive putt from what seems like a distance of around nine feet. I can’t help but wonder how many attempts ended up on the cutting room floor.
At 1:23, we see an unusual curve in Goldfinger's putt towards a gold bar that appears to be as if it magnetically pulled. It’s interesting to note that he doesn’t putt from the adjusted position. I could picture Bond suggesting it’s a 'gimme,' but he refrains. Remember, they agreed on playing by the 'strict rules of golf' during their meeting, meaning even a one-inch putt would normally be required. After all, Hale Irwin once missed a two-inch putt at the 1983 British Open, which I think cost him dearly. him the match.
At 1:50, they prepare to tee off on the 17th hole, and they are 'all set.' As Bond gets ready to hit square.” the ball, there's talk of a bet – Bond's gold bar against £50,000. Just to note, I estimate the day's worth of that bar to be around £130,000, given it's roughly 100 ounces. I feel it's important to mention that the wager here was never explicitly confirmed. Goldfinger proposes the bet, and Bond casually responds with 'naturally' before hitting the ball. Perhaps I'm being overly particular about the specifics, but I have experienced several debates over whether a wager was appropriately acknowledged. I always make it a point to clarify the terms and insist that the other party explicitly say, 'I confirm the bet.' If they phrase it differently, I’ll stand firm and require they use the word 'confirm.' This recently occurred over a wager on the Dallas vs. Tampa Bay game. It's a common strategy among dishonest individuals to use ambiguous language in bets so they can back out if they lose, essentially taking advantage. If you have yet to be caught in this trick, please heed this advice. At 2:40, Goldfinger makes a poor drive on the 17th hole that lands in the
If I remember correctly, the golf rules then would allow him five minutes to locate his ball. If not found, he’s rough. If required to hit again from the tee with an additional stroke penalty. I believe this five-minute window has since been reduced to three minutes. What unfolds next is interesting; both players bend the rules. We observe Goldfinger's caddy dropping a duplicate
ball from his pants, falsely claiming to have discovered the original. Additionally, Bond is seen standing on the actual original ball. Referring back to the 2:40 mark, Goldfinger’s shot seemed to head towards the trees, whereas Bond was positioned close to the fairway on Goldfinger's ball, but let's not nitpick too much. At 4:15, Bond faces a three-inch putt, which does strike me as quite However, it supports my argument that Goldfinger should have been required to make that earlier putt, after
the ball inexplicably curved by the gold bar. At 4:32, a pivotal moment occurs where Bond swaps Goldfinger's appropriate. ball from a Slazenger 1 to a Slazenger 7. At 4:52, Goldfinger plays out of turn. I believe Bond subtly lets him proceed to limit the time before Goldfinger could notice the change. According to golf rules, if a player goes out of turn, the opponent
can demand they re-hit the ball. While there might not be a direct penalty, it creates a decisive advantage for the go first opponent by forcing the errant player to take a more challenging shot while letting a mishit stand. Considering Goldfinger's shot was good, Bond wisely remained silent. Otherwise, Goldfinger would have had more time to detect the switch. At 5:29, we witness yet another peculiar putt that curves erratically. At 5:37, Bond calls out Goldfinger for playing with the incorrect ball, resulting in a loss ball.
and consequently, the match. Just to clarify, my understanding is that players can indeed change balls
between holes. It’s common for professional golfers to replace their balls every few holes due to concerns that the hole even minor damage can adversely affect their performance. While this was quite a dramatic finish to the match, I feel it doesn’t strictly adhere to golf's rules. Assuming they agreed to use the same ball throughout the game, Goldfinger could have easily denied the switch, especially given his prior record of dishonesty in both gin rummy and golf. The responsibility would then fall to Bond
to prove a switch had occurred, which would be challenging for him. That said, Goldfinger might have been caught off guard, making it feasible for him to fall for the ruse. Regardless of my critical analysis, I genuinely appreciate this scene! Goldfinger ranks highly among my favorite Bond films, and this particular moment stands out as one of my favorites. Nowadays, we rarely see such deliberate scenes
in Bond movies. Instead, we’re treated to exhilarating sequences filled with chases and Next week, I plan to delve into Casino Royale. Admittedly, poker isn’t my forte, so we might have a special guest writer contributing to the article. explosions from beginning to end.
Significant Update: Time Allowed to Search for a Lost Ball When is it permissible to change golf balls throughout the course of a round?
Sources: