Let it Ride - FAQ
From your Let it Ride In this section, avoiding a low pair is advised when you're considering whether to continue betting. What would the repercussions be if someone disregards this advice and makes that bet?
Continuing with a low pair (9s or below) is considered a poor wagering choice. The house has a 6.37% advantage when you have three cards with a low pair, and this figures worsens drastically to 45.83% if you opt for four cards. Therefore, resist the urge to proceed with low pairs.
I was lucky enough to hit four of a kind during a visit to a local casino, which led to me receiving an invitation to a tournament featuring around 300 players competing for a significant prize. I am curious about the best strategy to adopt. Each contestant begins with $5,000 in chips, and the minimum bet requires is set at $25 per hand. The tournament comprises multiple heats, with the first round eliminating all but 100 players, the second round reducing it to 25, the third round will have just 6, leading to the final. Let it Ride Navigating table game tournament strategies can be quite complex. However, in the initial stages of each round, a patient approach might work well. Sometimes other players exhaust themselves, allowing you to move forward with minimal effort. As the game progresses and only about five hands remain, it’s crucial to be aggressive toward anyone who has a lead. This is the juncture where you should aim to take the lead, or risk going all in to try. It’s wise to delay big bets until you act right after your closest rivals.
I recently had the chance to visit one of the Indian casinos in our state, accompanied by a visitor from out of town. They offered some enticing games, but I noticed the payout for a Royal Flush was only 500 to 1. I'm interested to know how this affects the house advantage for that game?
With that payout structure, the house edge rises from 3.506% to 3.737%. Let It Ride I’d like to understand what the player's edge would be in Let It Ride if one could view both community cards as opposed to only one. Is there a method to calculate this?
When observing both community cards, your edge would be at 42.06%. Unfortunately, I don't have exact figures for just one card, but intuitively, it should still provide a significant advantage, especially if the second card is known.
Has there been any analysis on optimal betting strategies in 'Let It Ride' when factoring in additional knowledge? Although casinos discourage players from looking at others’ hands, many players seem to know at least a few of the other players' cards. I might consider pursuing an inside straight if I can be certain that at least six of the cards on the table won't help me.
Indeed! In the book Mastering the Game of Let It Ride by Stanley Ko, a section is dedicated to this specific area. Ko elaborates on how the odds can fluctuate if you have a 4-card straight or flush and additional cards come into play. However, he doesn’t mention adjustments made at the three-card stage of the game. You can find that booklet at your convenience.
I’m curious why you're suggesting to fold a 2-3-4 straight flush in Let It Ride? I get folding A-2-3 since there's only 'one side' to complete. But folding 2-3-4 seems similar to any other outside straight?
The 2-3-4 straight has two potential paths to completion (such as A-2-3-4-5 or 2-3-4-5-6), but a 3-4-5 has three possible ways (A-2-3-4-5, 2-3-4-5-6, and 3-4-5-6-7) to round it out. Gambler's Book Club .
I will soon be in Reno and have often visited your site regarding Let It Ride and craps. I tend to have better luck at Let It Ride. How does the number of players impact my chances of winning at Let It Ride, if at all?
If you're not privy to any other players' cards, the number of participants won’t affect your odds. Enjoy your time in Reno!
I comprehend the calculations determining the house advantage for various games. My question relates primarily to games with higher payouts (like the royal flush in Let It Ride). Wouldn’t it make sense to evaluate the 'house advantage' excluding the royal flush? Although hitting one is feasible, it is rare for the average player. Would this adjusted house edge be more relevant for most players? Thank you for maintaining such a fantastic website.
You raise a valid point. When considering short-term expectations, it would be sensible to disregard the most significant hands. I’ve noted that video poker players often exclude royal flushes when projecting short-term results. Nevertheless, adhering to mathematical rigor requires a consideration of all possible outcomes, regardless of their improbability.
While I played 'Let It Ride' on a video machine last week, someone mentioned that my odds would improve if I played at a table with 6 players due to the greater number of cards in play (20 instead of 5). Is this true?
Not quite. Unless you can visibly track the other players' cards and implement that information into your strategy, the number of players doesn’t influence the odds at all.
I recently read an article on another website discussing Three Card Poker, where the writer referred to the 'Pair Plus' bet as a sucker bet compared to the 'ante' bet. Between these two, I regard the 'ante' bet as more disadvantageous due to its higher house edge. Comparing risk levels, how does Three Card Poker stack up against Let It Ride, assuming the player bets $5 in both scenarios?
Excellent question. In a full-play setting, the house edge for Pair Plus stands at 2.32%, while for Ante & Play it's 3.37%. Regardless, the Pair Plus maintains a risk aspect of 2.32%, and Ante & Play denotes 2.01%. A more fitting comparison, when scrutinizing one game versus another, is to evaluate the risk against total betting amounts. In this instance, Ante & Play shows a lower risk quotient, making it the preferable wager. Thus, I differ from the conclusions drawn by the author of the article you mentioned.
In fact, the risk element in Let It Ride runs at 2.85%, which is higher than that of Antie & Play.
How does letting specific hands ride in Let It Ride affect the house's advantage? house edge index 1) three unrelated cards (like A-K-Q and K-Q-J, for instance)
2) low connected cards suitable for a straight flush (like 3-4-5)
3) something in the realm of J-10-7 of diamonds, having a gap of 5.
Thank you, Mike, for maintaining a fantastic site as always (I will express my gratitude every time).
Thanks for your kind words. To clarify, you should indeed consider letting it ride with suited 3-4-5 (three consecutive suited cards) and suited 7-10-J (three cards toward a straight flush featuring two high cards with gaps). My own strategies reflect this. I’ll outline how these hands affect your expected returns, measured in specific units. For instance, betting three units of $1 on an unsuited A-K-Q would set you back 18.62 cents.
Last weekend, I enjoyed playing Let It Ride at El Dorado in Reno. The side bet payouts were 20000 for Royal, 2000 for Straight Flush, 200 for Four of a Kind, 75 for Full House, 50 for Flush, 25 for Straight, 5 for Three of a Kind, 4 for Two Pair, and 1 for a High Pair. I didn't see details on house edge; what would it be?
This payout structure creates a 13.07% house edge, which I believe is the lowest I've encountered for Let It Ride. Nonetheless, it still represents a rather unfavored bet.
Unsuited A-K-Q: -0.186224
Unsuited K-Q-J: -0.104592
While I acknowledge mathematically anything is conceivable, I witnessed something at the casino that felt incredibly improbable, about a billion to one. Here’s what transpired: Over the span of 40 hands (40 separate 3 card deals spread over 8 rounds with 5 players) at a Let It Ride table, there were 3 instances of four of a kind. Given that four of a kind is estimated at about 4100 to 1, what would the odds be for encountering three instances within 40 hands? This is puzzling me as a long-time follower.
I have a question regarding what happens to the house advantage if one could see all 7 players' cards. Would this potentially lead to a negative house advantage?
In 'Mastering the Game of Let It Ride', this subject is tackled by Stanley Ko. He states that the primary advantage of viewing other players’ cards comes when you have a borderline hand of 4 to an outside straight, without high cards or JQKA. Spotting a single card shouldn't persuade you to 'let it ride', but observing a card that doesn't assist you should encourage you to do so. Ko implies that it isn’t feasible to reach a negative house edge through this means, and I also doubt it makes a significant dent in the house edge overall.
While I trust your Let It Ride strategies, I often find myself raising on a low pair with three cards. Frequently, I have seen these hands develop into winning combinations. Could you quantify what my decision to raise on low pairs is costing me?3*(1-p)37A low pair yields an expected value of -7.40% on your initial bet. Thus, if your original wager is $10, continuing with a low pair will incur an additional cost of 74 cents.
What are the odds of getting two four of a kinds during a two-hour session playing Let It Ride?
The chance of attaining a four of a kind in a single hand is calculated as 13*48/combin(52,5) = 0.0002401. Assuming you can play 120 hands over two hours, the likelihood of precisely two four of a kinds would be combin(120,2) * 0.0002401.
I really enjoy your website; it’s incredibly engaging. Thank you for creating it! I’m curious, does it accurately depict how a live casino game operates? Additionally, does it function using a freshly shuffled virtual deck for each hand dealt?
It mirrors the authentic experience very closely. Casinos typically utilize a shuffling machine known for its high quality. My program emulates this and shuffles the deck after every round as well.
Next weekend, I'm off to Las Vegas and plan to play $5 blackjack and Let It Ride at the tables. Will I find open $5 tables on a weekend, or should I prepare to bring extra funds? If $5 tables are scarce, where can I expect to find them?
Explore the Top Online Casinos Available in Your Region2× (1-0.0002401)118= 0.000400095 = 1 in 2499.41.
Hi I’ve been playing the Java Let It Ride Game Calculator for Estimating Lottery Jackpot Ticket Sales
Participate in Slot Tournaments Featuring Huge Prize Pools
In this section, you wouldn't consider a low pair to be a solid hand for 'letting it ride'. How unfavorable would it be to disregard your suggestion?
Betting on a low pair (9s or lower) is certainly not a wise choice. The house edge is 6.37% when played with three cards, which shoots up to 45.83% with four cards. Therefore, avoid the temptation to take a chance on low pairs.
I was fortunate enough to hit four of a kind at a nearby casino, which led to an invitation to a competition with around 300 players vying for a significant cash prize. I'm curious about the best strategy for this setting. Each participant will start with $5,000 in chips, and the minimum bet per hand will be $25. The tournament will have several rounds, with the first round eliminating all but 100 players, the second narrowing it down to 25, the third reducing it to 6, and finally a last round.
Strategizing for a table game tournament can be quite intricate. Initially, my approach would be to play conservatively during the first hands of each round. Many opponents might make rash bets and you could progress without substantial effort. As the rounds approach the last five hands, it's crucial to make your move against any opponents who are outpacing you. This is the moment to try to take the lead or risk going out entirely. Additionally, it's wise to withhold your larger bets for rounds where you play after your most formidable challengers.
Hands per Hour and Average House Edge
Games | Hands/Hour | House Edge |
Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Blackjack | 70 | 0.75% |
Big Six | 10 | 15.53% |
Craps | 48 | 1.58% |
Car. Stud | 50 | 1.46% |
Let It Ride | 52 | 2.4% |
Mini-Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Midi-Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Pai Gow | 30 | 1.65% |
Pai Pow Poker | 34 | 1.96% |
Roulette | 38 | 5.26% |
Single 0 Roulette | 35 | 2.59% |
Casino War | 65 | 2.87% |
Spanish 21 | 75 | 2.2% |
Sic Bo | 45 | 8% |
3 Way Action | 70 | 2.2% |
Not long ago, I visited one of the Native American casinos in my state with a friend from out of town. They offer various games, but the payout for a Royal Flush is only 500 to 1. I'm interested in understanding how that impacts the house edge in the game.
This adjustment raises the house edge from 3.506% to 3.737%.
I'm curious about the player's edge in Let It Ride when they can see both community cards versus only one. I've heard it's possible to calculate this.
If you have visibility on both community cards, your edge would rise to 42.06%. I don't have the specific advantage for seeing one card, but I believe it would also be significant, particularly if the additional card is beneficial.
Has there been any research on optimal betting strategies in 'Let It Ride' when players have more information? I know that casinos prohibit player peeking at others' hands but it seems players often know the hands of at least two individuals. I might consider going for an inside straight if I'm aware that at least six cards on the table can't help my hand. Let It Ride Absolutely! In Mastering the Game of Let It Ride by Stanley Ko, a portion is dedicated to this subject. He illustrates how the odds can shift when you are holding four cards toward a straight or flush and have extra cards to look at. However, he doesn't discuss any adjustments during the three-card phase of play. You can find this booklet at that link.
I'm curious why you advise folding a 2-3-4 straight flush hand in Let It Ride. I understand folding A-2-3 as it only has 'one side' to match, but the 2-3-4 seems no different than any other outside straight hand.
There are only two routes to complete the 2-3-4 straight (A-2-3-4-5, 2-3-4-5-6), whereas for the 3-4-5 straight, there are three possibilities (A-2-3-4-5, 2-3-4-5-6, 3-4-5-6-7).
I plan to visit Reno soon and have enjoyed using your site for insights on Let It Ride and craps. It seems I have better luck with LIR than with craps. Does the number of players at LIR influence my chance of success in any way?
As long as you aren't looking at the cards of other players, it makes no difference. Enjoy your time in Reno.
Mini Royal: 50 to 1
Straight flush: 40 to 1
Three of a kind: 30 to 1
Straight: 6 to 1
Flush: 4 to 1
Pair: 1 to 1
I grasp the mathematics behind calculating the house advantage for various games. My question pertains to games with high payouts (like hitting a royal flush in Let It Ride). Wouldn't it be more practical to calculate the 'house advantage' excluding the royal flush? While it's theoretically possible to hit a royal flush, it’s highly unlikely for the average player. Wouldn’t this adjusted house advantage be more relevant for someone who plays regularly? Thank you for your informative site.
You bring up an interesting point. When considering short-term expectations, it's advisable to overlook the highest hands. I know that some video poker players dismiss the royal flush when evaluating their short-term forecasts. However, as someone who appreciates mathematical accuracy, I must factor in every possible scenario, no matter how improbable.
Last week, I played 'Let It Ride' on a video machine. Someone mentioned that my odds could be better at a table with six players, since more cards would be dealt (20 instead of 5). Is that correct?
No, unless you're able to see other players' cards and incorporate that information into your strategy, the number of players involved won't affect the odds.
I just read an article on a different website about Three Card Poker. The author classified the 'Pair Plus' bet as a sucker’s bet compared to the 'ante' bet. Personally, I believe the 'ante' bet is more of a sucker's bet due to its steeper house edge. Also, how does the risk factor in Three Card Poker compare to Let It Ride if both odds start with $5 bets in the three betting circles for Let It Ride and $5 in the Pair Plus and ante for Three Card Poker?
Great question. In Three Card Poker, the house advantage is 2.32% for Pair Plus and 3.37% for Ante & Play. Yet, the risk associated with Pair Plus remains at 2.32%, while Ante & Play has a lower risk element at 2.01%. When comparing games, it’s often more helpful to evaluate risk as it relates to expected losses against total bets. In this case, Ante & Play has a lower risk factor, making it the preferable option. Therefore, I would not agree with that article’s perspective. combin The risk factor in Let It Ride is 2.85%, which is higher than Ante & Play.2×(1-0.000013852)358= 1 in 81,055. Stranger things have happened.
What is the additional house edge for allowing these particular hands to 'ride' in Let It Ride?
According to Beyond Counting (Exhibit CAA) 1) Three cards of different suits (like A-K-Q and K-Q-J), Let It Ride page 2) Low connected cards for a straight flush (3-4-5),