Ask The Wizard #38
Are you suggesting that technology has allowed us to fit three million transistors onto a microprocessor that’s no bigger than a fingernail, yet we can't develop a strategy to win consistently on a game that offers even odds? This seems quite improbable to me. Additionally, I've discovered that computer simulations don't accurately reflect the dynamics of real-life gaming situations. Why haven't casinos adopted video blackjack to counteract card counters and eliminate the need for live dealers?
I've mentioned repeatedly that there's no reliable method to triumph in games that come with a house advantage. If a game truly had an even chance with no house benefit, it would be difficult to assure consistent wins or losses in practical scenarios. Over time, results will invariably align with the house edge. This isn't solely supported by simulations but is also rooted in the fundamental principles of probability.
Regarding video blackjack, it could represent the future of gaming. At the World Gaming Expo, I encountered fully digital tables equipped with video displays. There are also tables outfitted with cameras capable of monitoring every bet and player action, which helps the casino track player activity and identify card counters. These tables are designed to replicate the traditional blackjack experience, potentially putting card counters out of business if they gain popularity.
In the context of a hundred points established in craps: (1) What are the expected quantities of points at 4/10, 5/9, or 6/8, and (2) Out of those hundred, how many times would each point (4/10, 5/9, 6/8) be rolled in comparison to a 7?
From those 100 points set, on average, you'd see about 41.67 occurrences of either 6 or 8, roughly 33.33 of 5 or 9, and about 25 occurrences of 4 or 10. Consequently, you can anticipate around 18.94 points on a 6 or 8, 13.33 on 5 or 9, and approximately 8.33 on 4 or 10.
I apply Basic Strategy when playing blackjack. I increase my bets whenever I notice a lot of low cards and decrease them if high cards appear. During my most recent visit to Las Vegas, two casinos asked me to leave the table! Can you share your thoughts on this situation? It feels quite unjust.
You clearly recognize that a deck with an abundance of high cards benefits the player, while a deck dominated by low cards benefits the dealer. Even though your strategy is a very basic form of card counting, it still falls under that category. Casinos in Nevada are well within their rights to take such actions.
In the future, I suggest being more subtle in your betting approach. Avoid increasing your bet by more than double, and ideally only after winning. If you sense that you’re being observed, it’s better to leave before they have to ask you to. It’s wise not to linger too long at one table. Ian Anderson's \"Turning the Tables in Las Vegas\" contains many useful tips for blending in as an average player while engaging in card counting.
When placing bets on a greyhound race, they've put odds on each dog, such as \"9-2, 7-2, 10-1.\" What do these figures signify?
The odds of 9-2 imply that a $2 wager would yield $9 in winnings. Therefore, if you bet $2, you would receive $11 in total: $9 winnings added to your initial $2 stake. Similarly, the 7-2 odds indicate a $2 bet would win $7, while 10-1 means that a $1 bet would net you $10.
Last night, I was playing roulette using the \"Martingale\" strategy, which involves doubling my stake after the first loss. I realize that this might be unwise, but I typically don’t lose a lot since I gamble for extended periods. Nevertheless, my game ended when, while betting even, the number 9 showed up three times out of four spins. What are the odds of that happening? Does this seem suspicious? Have casinos ever been caught cheating?
The likelihood of a specific number appearing three times in four rolls can be calculated as 38*4*(1/38)*(37/38) = 1/5932. However, if you play for long enough, you’re bound to notice unusual patterns such as this one. This isn’t quite sufficient to raise suspicion. Cheating can indeed occur in physical casinos, usually involving a rogue dealer that security eventually catches. Although there have been significant accusations of cheating against online casinos, to my knowledge, no governmental authority has ever secured a conviction in such cases.3Have you ever thought about how commissions work, especially since junket players receive compensation based on their turnover? While starting such ventures usually requires a substantial capital investment, these commissions can actually lessen the house's advantage. I’ve done the math, and it appears that if you adhere to basic strategy in blackjack, you could potentially tilt the odds slightly in your favor—even without resorting to card counting! Have you conducted similar calculations in the past? If so, what were your findings?
Assuming you could receive compensation for your gambling activities, it would indeed be feasible to turn a profit from junket play, depending on whether the commission surpasses your expected losses from gambling. I’ve heard of professional gamblers leveraging these offers in casinos across Asia.
Where are the most reputable places to play Blackjack in Atlantic City, and what makes those locations stand out?
Mike and Taffy M. from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
At casinos like Cowboy Casino (which has multi-player options), I often don't see other active players. The length of losing streaks I face there tends to be more frequent compared to places like Gold Club. Is it possible for Cowboy or any Boss Media casino to manipulate the games to be more difficult for specific players?
I like the Boss Media Gordon from Charlottesville, Virginia.
In your pai-gow poker guidelines, you mention A-2-3-4-5 as the second-highest straight. Why is it not the 9-10-J-Q-K that holds this distinction? Can you clarify?
This has always puzzled me as well. Perhaps it falls into the realm of oddities, much like the peculiar spelling of the word 'colonel.'
I was curious about your recommendation to fold a 2-3-4 straight flush in the game \"Let It Ride.\" While I understand folding an A-2-3 makes sense—due to having only one side to match—why doesn’t the same logic apply to the 2-3-4, which seems comparable to any other outside straight?
There are two pathways to complete a 2-3-4 straight (A-2-3-4-5 and 2-3-4-5-6), but three possible sequences for completing a 3-4-5 straight (A-2-3-4-5, 2-3-4-5-6, and 3-4-5-6-7).
Isn’t it even riskier to bet on multiple numbers at once in roulette, which many players do, as opposed to making a series of independent bets on one number? For instance, if I had $100, wouldn’t it be safer to place 10 bets of $10 on the number \"8\" rather than betting $10 on 10 different numbers simultaneously? It seems like hedging your bets ensures that several of those (in this example, 9 bets) will always result in a loss. Why don’t you address the concept of hedging on your site?
The sixth rule is \"never hedge your bets.\" Regarding your roulette inquiry, the chances of losing all ten individual bets when placed one at a time is (37/38) = 76.59%. In contrast, the probability of losing all bets when wagering on different numbers at once is (28/38) = 73.68%. When hedging, though you reduce your chances of complete failure, you simultaneously cap your maximum winnings to $26. A player who bets individually has the opportunity to win up to $350. Both strategies share the same anticipated return of 94.74%.
See my Ten Commandments of Gambling I went through your page on betting systems, and I’ve been sharing this information for years! I work as a dealer in roulette at a casino, and I have encountered numerous systems make their rounds. One particular system appears to 'work' in practice, even if it doesn't seem effective in computer simulations. This means I've seen it be more successful than not.10The method involves placing $75 on the 1 to 18, $50 on the 3rd 12, and $10 on the 0-00 split, which totals $135. This strategy covers all but six numbers (19 through 22) and results in a $15 payout whenever the ball lands on any of the other numbers, unless it hits 0 or 00, in which case it pays $40. While it may sound crazy, I assure you that I’ve witnessed it yielding more wins than losses. It can also be reversed. I’d love to understand the true odds of this technique, but it’s challenging to convince someone it doesn’t work when they leave my table with a profit of $2000.
There are 30 opportunities to win $15, 6 chances to lose $135, and 2 ways to win $45 (not $40). The expected return for this configuration of bets is calculated as ((30/38)*15 + (6/38)*-135 + (2/38)*(45))/135 = -0.0526, which translates to a 5.26% house edge on any single wager or combination of bets, assuming one avoids the troublesome 0-00-1-2-3 combination. As you've likely observed, there may be fewer occurrences of numbers 19 through 24, contributing to the perception that this method is yielding more success.
In my town, a new variant of a card game has appeared, one without a maximum ante and with increased maximum payouts. Previously, the limits were a minimum of 2, a maximum of 50, and a payout capped at 2000; now, the new limits are a minimum of 25, with no maximum but a cap on payouts at 3000. My inquiry is whether this change is advantageous or disadvantageous for me as a player. I don’t know how to work out the odds, but perhaps you can assist me with that. Additionally, in this location, we play with the option to change one card for an ante.
In games with a fixed maximum payout, you should never wager an amount that would cause you to hit that payout cap. For instance, if the top payout is $2000 with odds of 100:1 for the biggest win, your bet shouldn’t exceed $20. Assuming a royal flush pays out at 100-1, the maximum bet should be $30. As long as you remain beneath these thresholds, the odds remain unchanged. The game variation that allows card switching is termed...
I have a question regarding Caribbean Stud Statistically sound strategies and resources for casino games, including blackjack, craps, roulette, and many more that one can partake in.
Please check your email inbox for a link we sent you to finalize your registration. Oasis Poker .