Ask The Wizard #203
Hello, I just hit a significant slots jackpot in Las Vegas. They deducted around $38,000 for taxes. As a citizen and tax resident of New Zealand, where there’s no gambling tax, I'm confused. While the U.S. and New Zealand have a tax treaty, I still faced deductions. I believe I should be eligible for a refund or a portion of it. I've been getting mixed guidance from tax professionals here. Could you suggest a reputable U.S. tax accountant or provide any practical advice? I found your website very helpful, especially the tips for dealing with dealers and hosts.
This topic is a bit outside my expertise, but I'll do my best to assist. According to the IRS website, the U.S. has tax treaties with numerous countries including Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the UK. It's important to note that New Zealand isn't included in this list.
If you happen to reside in one of the countries mentioned, and you win a jackpot of $1,200 or greater, you should request to complete a W8BEN form. This form can help to lower or even completely waive the tax withholding.
Even if you're not from one of the listed nations or don't fill out the W8BEN, there’s still a possibility of reclaiming the withholding by submitting form 1040NR or its simplified version, the 1040NR-EZ.
My personal tax advisor is Marissa Chien, an Enrolled Agent and author of Tax Help for Gamblers. She's incredibly skilled at her job, although some may find her fees to be on the higher side. For filing a 1040NR, she indicates a charge of around $1,000, noting that many others often incorrectly complete this form. You can reach her via email at .
IRS PDFs:
- 1040NR-EZ instructions (PDF)
- 1040NR-EZ form (PDF)
- 1040NR instructions (PDF)
- 1040NR form (PDF)
- W8BEN instructions (PDF)
- W8BEN form (PDF)
Marissa also engages with followers on Twitter under the handle @taxpro4gamblers, where she occasionally responds to tax-related inquiries.
I've come across the term 'strangle the blind' in poker games. Could you clarify what that means?
I checked with my friend Jason for clarification, and here’s his response:
"What she's likely referring to is a blind straddle. This occurs when the player acting after the big blind chooses to raise the amount to double the big blind before even looking at their cards. This strategy generally aims to encourage more action in games where players have been folding pre-flop often. For instance, in a $6-$12 limit hold 'em game, where the small blind is $3 and the big blind is $6, if I am next to the big blind, I could choose to make it $12 before seeing my cards.\" — Jason
Hello, I have invented a card game that I believe would be perfect for casinos. I'm in the process of securing a patent. I’m seeking guidance on how to introduce it to a casino and am considering finding a partner to assist with this.
I provide insights on this subject in my article about Table Games. Additionally, Eliot Jacobson has a valuable article that discusses what makes a carnival game successful.
While browsing your section on the distinction between two subjects, I noticed something. First off, it seems that the element of risk hinges on the strategy that aligns with the house advantage. I have a point to consider: the optimal strategy for some games may shift if the goal is to lower the element of risk. For example, element of risk and house edge , logically, one might think playing hands like 5/2 off-suit would be a less risky choice. My intuition suggests that playing all hands might reduce risk below the stated 0.53% figure. Texas Hold 'Em Bonus You’re correct that diverging from my strategy can indeed reduce your risk and involve raising with hands that have an expected value slightly under -1. Taking the 5/2 example, its expected value is about -1.019987 according to Las Vegas rules. This essentially means that if you raise with it, on average, you would end up losing approximately 1.02 times your original bet once the hand concludes. Following the initial raise and any subsequent raises after the flop and turn, the average bet for that round would be approximately 3.627374 units. From my perspective, the raise bet is worth -0.0109987 units when compared to the additional 2.627374 units wagered. This leads to a marginal win-to-bet ratio of -0.0109987/2.627374, which equals -0.00761. This figure is lower than the game's overall expected value of -2.04%. Therefore, if your aim is to limit losses based on the total amount wagered, including raises, then indeed, you should consider raising with that hand. Similar justifications can be drawn in many games that incorporate raising.
In summary, if your objective is to reduce losses per hand, it's advisable to adhere to the house edge minimizing strategies provided on this site. Conversely, if you're looking to lower losses relative to the total amount staked, opting for larger bets on borderline plays is the way to go.
Greetings! In Australia, we have a lottery known as Lotto, where a high cash prize is granted if you successfully match six numbers drawn from a pool of 45 (ranging from 1-45). Many players buy a 'Slik Pik' ticket, which includes 12 games, each with six supposedly random selections. It's amusing that in these 12 games, the same number can show up 6 to 7 times. It makes you wonder about the randomness of it all! My query is, what is the statistically expected frequency for any number to repeat six or seven times in this random selection process?
The anticipated frequency for any specific number to appear exactly n times across 12 games is calculated as follows:
. In the accompanying table, you can find the expected counts from 0 up to 12 occurrences. combination (12,n)×(6/45)n×(39/45)n-12To address your inquiry, you can expect the same number to show up exactly six times approximately 0.099 times per set of drawings, or roughly once in every 10.1 sets. As for a number appearing exactly seven times, that would happen around 0.0131 times per set, equating to about once in 76.6 sets.
Expected number of repeat numbers
Repeats | Expected |
---|---|
0 | 8.0804888027 |
1 | 14.9178254818 |
2 | 12.6227754077 |
3 | 6.4732181578 |
4 | 2.2407293623 |
5 | 0.5515641507 |
6 | 0.0989986937 |
7 | 0.0130547728 |
8 | 0.0012552666 |
9 | 0.0000858302 |
10 | 0.0000039614 |
11 | 0.0000001108 |
12 | 0.0000000014 |
Total | 45 |
Here are mathematically sound strategies and information tailored for various casino games, including blackjack, craps, roulette, and many more.