Ask The Wizard #17
I know. I know: Casino War While this game might seem simplistic, Casino Niagara introduces a unique twist to it. In instances of a tie, players are required to make a second bet equal to the first one. If they win afterward, they receive a payout at 2-1 odds. In the case of another tie following the second card deal, players are awarded 3-1. I believe that these adjustments significantly diminish the house advantage. Do you agree?
I appreciate you highlighting this particular variation for me. At Casino Niagara, they present the rules of casino war differently. What they neglect to clarify is that if there’s a tie, the original stake is considered lost.
Essentially, in this variation, a player receives twice the ante for winning after a tie, and three times the ante for achieving a tie following a tie. Generally, the typical rules still yield two times the ante for a secondary tie. This adjustment effectively reduces the house advantage from 2.88% to 2.33%.
I have a rather heavyset friend who has become somewhat obsessed with the success he’s had betting on the Player in baccarat. He is wagering in units of $10 and believes that a streak of nine consecutive Banker wins is unlikely. In an attempt to recoup losses, he escalates his bets to a risky total of $3,980 by following a pattern of 10, 10, 30, 60, 120, 250, 500, 1000, 2000. How can I find solid mathematical proof to persuade him to stop this risky behavior?
This approach closely resembles the Martingale betting strategy, where the player doubles their bet after each loss. Although Martingale often leads to wins, there are times when a player might experience an unmanageable number of sequential losses resulting in significant financial damage. If your friend is consistently betting on the player, the likelihood of encountering nine consecutive losses is represented by the fraction (2153464/(2153464+2212744)).9 = .001727, or 1 in 579, assuming ties are ignored. There is more information available about the folly of the Martingale in my section on betting systems Nevertheless, the more outrageous a belief tends to be, the harder it is to shake off. Often, it takes a considerable loss for someone firmly believing in a betting system to reconsider their approach.
When determining the house edge in blackjack, do you account for pushes similarly to how it's done in baccarat?
Indeed, I incorporate pushes into the calculation of the house edge. The only exceptions are specific bets in craps that typically result in a push—such as place, buy, lay, and hard ways—which usually stay active until they are resolved. For these types of bets, my definition of the house edge is based on the anticipated loss per bet that has been resolved.
Which website offers the best opportunity to play free online blackjack?
Bovada features a wide variety of games available for enjoyment, including blackjack. You don’t need to create an account; simply click once to start playing. Head over to the Instant Play casino section and click on 'practice' to play blackjack.
I've noticed that the odds published for single-deck blackjack seem to favor the player. Does this imply that by playing repeatedly, I have a better chance of winning compared to the house?
Finding a blackjack game where a player utilizing basic strategies holds an advantage over the house is quite rare. The player advantage shown for single-deck blackjack on my site derives from rules typically associated with multiple-deck games, which are seldom found in single-deck variants. I organized the data this way to showcase how the number of decks impacts gameplay. Unified Gaming presents the best blackjack option for basic strategy players that I’ve come across in any venue. You can find a list of them on my site. online casino index If you happen to engage in a game that has a negative house edge, then yes, that certainly provides you with better odds than what the house offers, provided you adhere to the basic strategy.
I appreciate your website; it has clarified many of my inquiries. Concerning downloaded online casinos, are the games executed from a remote server or directly from your personal computer? I ask this because I have doubts about the fairness of some casinos. Would downloading the games guard against cheating if they run locally on my computer? Specifically, in the context of roulette, is the outcome determined by the server or the software on my machine? And if there are manipulations occurring, do you believe they stem from programmed cheats or from live operators influencing the game?
No, even when you download the software, you are still engaging in gameplay governed by a remote server. Though there might be a day when players can use their own systems, casinos would be faced with the concern of cheating on players’ parts. Regardless of whether the game is downloadable or Java-based, the results in roulette are dictated by a distant server. The software you install merely presents the visuals and creates the connection with the casino's online server.
Sadly, instances of cheating in casinos do arise. I maintain a log of various suspicious incidents on my site. blacklist .
Fantastic website! It’s clear that the Wizard is in charge! I’m a huge fan of enjoying some free online casino games. My current go-to is 'quick draw' poker, where the jackpot keeps growing on gamesville.com.
To start, could you suggest the optimal strategy for this particular game? Based on the rules, players are allowed to engage in 17 hands and can wager 0, 1, 2, 5, or 10 points on each hand. The goal is to elevate your initial point count of 150 to reach 500 within those 17 hands. Additionally, could you recommend other free gaming sites and effective strategies?
I noticed your email is affiliated with U.C. Santa Barbara, which is my alma mater. I graduated with a BA in mathematics/economics in ’88. As a fellow Gaucho, I dedicated some time to play this game and aimed to help! During one session, I managed to amass 426 points. For those who might be curious, this game consists of 17 rounds of jacks-or-better video poker, featuring a pay table quite different from those in actual casinos. Notably, a high pair pays out at 2:1, while two pair awards 4:1.
Given the generous payout structure of this game, players should opt for the maximum wager unless they’re dealt completely worthless cards. When dealt garbage, the expected return hovers around 0.7 times the amount bet. If obtaining a single high card, the return increases to 0.94 times the wager. With a low pair in hand, players can expect a return of 1.53 times their bet. Opting for the maximum on a solitary high card might seem unwise, but aggression is essential in this context. As you get closer to the target, it's wise to continue betting the maximum, even if the cards are subpar, because it may take a long shot to ultimately achieve 500. Holding back pairs for the sake of going for four to a straight or flush might not be advisable; you'll likely need a four of a kind to hit the 500 mark.
In Natchez, we have a riverboat casino that features a blackjack variant utilizing six decks. They also provide an enticing bonus: if both the player and dealer manage a royal match in the same hand, the player receives an extra $1,000. How does this enhance the gameplay from a house edge perspective? Royal Match This delightful $1000 bonus decreases the house advantage from 6.67% to 6.00% when based on a $1 wager.
Using your fundamental strategy for Cryptologic, what are the odds of earning five units prior to incurring losses of 20? If I participated every day for a year, only withdrawing after either gaining five units or losing 20 units, what might my overall net outcome look like?
A similar query was raised in the column from June 15, which I explored in detail. However, to summarize, I estimate that the success rate is approximately 78%. Throughout the year, you could anticipate a loss of around 0.52% (reflecting the house edge) relative to your total initial bets.
Accurate mathematical strategies and insights regarding casino games such as blackjack, craps, roulette, and hundreds of others are available for players.